futeko.com FORUM

Product Support => HiMedia Q10 Pro, Q5 Pro => Topic started by: UHD on March 03, 2016, 08:59:19 PM

Title: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: UHD on March 03, 2016, 08:59:19 PM
Will either of these (Q5 and Q10 Pro) permit viewing of BD .ISO files from my NAS ?

If so will they support full menus ?

Also , what advantage (if any) is there to buy the Q10 Pro over the Q5 if I have a NAS already ?

Thanks for taking the time to read my post and all that reply.

p.s will be viewed on a Samsung UHD TV
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: futeko.com on March 04, 2016, 10:20:28 AM
Will either of these (Q5 and Q10 Pro) permit viewing of BD .ISO files from my NAS ?

If so will they support full menus ?

Also , what advantage (if any) is there to buy the Q10 Pro over the Q5 if I have a NAS already ?

Thanks for taking the time to read my post and all that reply.

p.s will be viewed on a Samsung UHD TV

Both will enable playback of BD-ISO files stored on a NAS. The previous generation Q5/Q10 4K3D would do this too.

They both support a custom menu, not full menus (see here: http://www.digihouse.gr/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Q5-II-photo-8.jpg). This menu gives control over chapters, subtitles, language etc.

No media player type device supports BD menus. Only Blu-Ray players can display full menus.

We don't have final final specs for Q5 Pro yet, but the only core hardware element that might be different is 8GB flash vs 16GB in Q10 Pro. Otherwise, if you are streaming from a NAS then the only advantage Q10 has over Q5 is larger front LCD.
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: Nice Monkey on March 04, 2016, 10:54:32 AM
They both support a custom menu, not full menus (see here: http://www.digihouse.gr/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Q5-II-photo-8.jpg). This menu gives control over chapters, subtitles, language etc.

No media player type device supports BD menus. Only Blu-Ray players can display full menus.

Would be interesting to know how this deals with recent Cinavia variants as being implemented by Lionsgate.
A good example is 'The Age of Adeline". This is a BD using many files for the main movie and not a single big one. They are linked via  it seems a dynamic playlist. When played on a real BD player it works just fine. When using a Media Player (even very old players) they run into a screen with a Cinavia warning. It does not mute audio like normal Cinavia warning does but it really stops there. If you do next chapter you end up anywhere within the movie.
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: UHD on March 06, 2016, 03:42:25 PM
Quote from: futeko.com

Both will enable playback of BD-ISO files stored on a NAS. The previous generation Q5/Q10 4K3D would do this too.

They both support a custom menu, not full menus (see here: http://www.digihouse.gr/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Q5-II-photo-8.jpg). This menu gives control over chapters, subtitles, language etc.

No media player type device supports BD menus. Only Blu-Ray players can display full menus.

We don't have final final specs for Q5 Pro yet, but the only core hardware element that might be different is 8GB flash vs 16GB in Q10 Pro. Otherwise, if you are streaming from a NAS then the only advantage Q10 has over Q5 is larger front LCD.

Thank you for the info :)
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: Feelingblue on March 13, 2016, 07:34:45 AM

No media player type device supports BD menus. Only Blu-Ray players can display full menus.


I think that new Dune Solo 4K supports full BD Menu.
And perhaps it should have a better implementation of the VXD engine compared to products like Popcorn.

In fact my choice will be one of the two, or HIMEDIA or Dune.
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: futeko.com on March 14, 2016, 09:15:46 AM

No media player type device supports BD menus. Only Blu-Ray players can display full menus.


I think that new Dune Solo 4K supports full BD Menu.
And perhaps it should have a better implementation of the VXD engine compared to products like Popcorn.

In fact my choice will be one of the two, or HIMEDIA or Dune.

Will be interesting when that Dune player is available widely if it does do BR menus. I'd be surprised.

Also, it's ~ twice the likely price of Q10 Pro..
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: Nice Monkey on March 14, 2016, 11:47:54 AM
Will be interesting when that Dune player is available widely if it does do BR menus. I'd be surprised.

Also, it's ~ twice the likely price of Q10 Pro..

It is not allowed to implement BD menus without implementing DRM including CINAVIA. technically no problem whatsoever. It is food for lawyers not for technicians.
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: looun on March 14, 2016, 12:32:03 PM

No media player type device supports BD menus. Only Blu-Ray players can display full menus.


I think that new Dune Solo 4K supports full BD Menu.
And perhaps it should have a better implementation of the VXD engine compared to products like Popcorn.

In fact my choice will be one of the two, or HIMEDIA or Dune.

Will be interesting when that Dune player is available widely if it does do BR menus. I'd be surprised.

Also, it's ~ twice the likely price of Q10 Pro..

Dune Solo 4K support Full BD Engine without issues
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/39-networking-media-servers-content-streaming/2259138-dune-hd-solo-4k-media-player-10.html#post41688249

but:
- have only HDMI 1.4 , no full UHD
- twice  price of Q10 pro
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: Nice Monkey on March 15, 2016, 08:02:53 AM

Dune Solo 4K support Full BD Engine without issues
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/39-networking-media-servers-content-streaming/2259138-dune-hd-solo-4k-media-player-10.html#post41688249

but:
- have only HDMI 1.4 , no full UHD
- twice  price of Q10 pro

It is a cheaper design at double the price. That leaves money for lawyers. Also on that forum the same statement can be found. They use 2 different players one with and one without full menu support. If that circumvents the legal problems? Obviously going straight to the movie has its charm, but does not always work correctly with some complex/protected playlist BD's. You don't need 2 different players for that choice, a simple configurable option to ask with/without at playtime would do also.

Wait and see how that goes. I am sure Himedia will follow it in detail. ;)
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: futeko.com on March 15, 2016, 10:10:48 AM
Looks like Q10 Pro and Dune 4K will end up being launched around similar time.

A few things as it stands:


BD-ISO full menus is perhaps the Dune's only selling point vs Q10 Pro.

A few players in the past have claimed BD-ISO full menus (notably RK1186 generation players) but in the real world the implementation was buggy and often unusable. This claim needs testing in the real world.!
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: hdmkv on March 16, 2016, 10:28:18 PM
Agree Dune isn't worth it, high price or not... just for menus? Just get me directly to the movie, thank you :)!
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: Nice Monkey on March 17, 2016, 08:29:33 AM
Agree Dune isn't worth it, high price or not... just for menus? Just get me directly to the movie, thank you :)!

Works for 98% of all ISO's but not always. Some BD's have a complex file/playlist structure with seamless branching between files and playback results into something weird. Do have a few of those. You can't re-mux those neither in an easy way to extract just the main movie. Burning those to a real BD-R  and playing them on a standard player obviously works just fine. This provided you have an old enough still Cinavia free BD-player, if not you may run into other problems again there.
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: UHD on March 21, 2016, 07:08:30 PM
Initially, do you actually need to have a HDD in the Q10 Pro (I have a QNAP NAS) or will it be fine without ?

I may add a HDD to it later if thats feasable ?
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: futeko.com on March 22, 2016, 07:07:22 AM
Initially, do you actually need to have a HDD in the Q10 Pro (I have a QNAP NAS) or will it be fine without ?

I may add a HDD to it later if thats feasable ?

There is no need to have a HDD in the Q10 Pro. It will work fine without.
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: Nice Monkey on March 27, 2016, 02:31:00 PM
Some of the advertised features for Dune are Auto-framerate and Auto-resolution. I always missed these options as my TV or AMP (QDEO) probably do a very good upscaling job?

At least i would like to have the control which component does that job and my collection is a true mix of everything.
 I see some intention for auto-framerate but auto-resolution is nowhere mentioned I think?
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: futeko.com on March 29, 2016, 09:01:15 AM
Some of the advertised features for Dune are Auto-framerate and Auto-resolution. I always missed these options as my TV or AMP (QDEO) probably do a very good upscaling job?

At least i would like to have the control which component does that job and my collection is a true mix of everything.
 I see some intention for auto-framerate but auto-resolution is nowhere mentioned I think?

What exactly is auto-resolution?
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: Nice Monkey on March 29, 2016, 11:31:28 AM
What exactly is auto-resolution?

Best word for a setting would not be "auto-resolution" but ""match source" or just "source".
It works as auto but then this re-applied for any media-file started to be played.  It tries to match that source then with the TV capabilities established via HDMI.
Any source format matching native supported format on the TV will result in that format without any upscaling being forwarded. Looks very similar to RAW for Audio.  RAW could also be used as a label for this option (= auto-framerate + auto-resolution).
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: futeko.com on March 29, 2016, 01:51:04 PM
What exactly is auto-resolution?

Best word for a setting would not be "auto-resolution" but ""match source" or just "source".
It works as auto but then this re-applied for any media-file started to be played.  It tries to match that source then with the TV capabilities established via HDMI.
Any source format matching native supported format on the TV will result in that format without any upscaling being forwarded. Looks very similar to RAW for Audio.  RAW could also be used as a label for this option (= auto-framerate + auto-resolution).

So for a DVD the box would switch to 480i output rather than upscaling?

Q10 Pro won't do this at the moment, but I will mention it to HiMedia.
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: Nice Monkey on March 29, 2016, 03:33:45 PM
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: UHD on March 29, 2016, 11:00:05 PM
Pre-ordered it now anyway ... I look forward to dispatch email then arrival  :)
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: looun on March 30, 2016, 02:45:49 PM
What exactly is auto-resolution?

Best word for a setting would not be "auto-resolution" but ""match source" or just "source".
It works as auto but then this re-applied for any media-file started to be played.  It tries to match that source then with the TV capabilities established via HDMI.
Any source format matching native supported format on the TV will result in that format without any upscaling being forwarded. Looks very similar to RAW for Audio.  RAW could also be used as a label for this option (= auto-framerate + auto-resolution).

So for a DVD the box would switch to 480i output rather than upscaling?

Q10 Pro won't do this at the moment, but I will mention it to HiMedia.

this is also a old requirement ask into kodi, but never do because there are many problems.
Resolution it's no always fix as refresh rate(24/23.976/50/60) ,but there are many 480/576/1080/.. and different aspect ratio 4/3 21/9 16/9 ecc...

so it's very complicated and there aren't lot of advantage
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: Nice Monkey on March 30, 2016, 04:49:19 PM

this is also a old requirement ask into kodi, but never do because there are many problems.
Resolution it's no always fix as refresh rate(24/23.976/50/60) ,but there are many 480/576/1080/.. and different aspect ratio 4/3 21/9 16/9 ecc...

so it's very complicated and there aren't lot of advantage

I really would take RAW mode literally. Don't try to do anything with it, get it from the source and forward it as is via HDMI. What is complicated with that?  The box on the other side needs to deal then with all the variables you mention. This may result in not displaying properly so what? Just stop play and select another option for that type of files.  Lets see how Dune does this!
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: looun on March 30, 2016, 05:08:56 PM

this is also a old requirement ask into kodi, but never do because there are many problems.
Resolution it's no always fix as refresh rate(24/23.976/50/60) ,but there are many 480/576/1080/.. and different aspect ratio 4/3 21/9 16/9 ecc...

so it's very complicated and there aren't lot of advantage

I really would take RAW mode literally. Don't try to do anything with it, get it from the source and forward it as is via HDMI. What is complicated with that?  The box on the other side needs to deal then with all the variables you mention. This may result in not displaying properly so what? Just stop play and select another option for that type of files.  Lets see how Dune does this!

not exist "video passthrough" like audio, it's impossible.
Title: Re: New possible user ... question about .ISO's
Post by: Nice Monkey on March 30, 2016, 05:57:26 PM
not exist "video passthrough" like audio, it's impossible.

I am not an expert but my Receiver gives me the choice to set an "Output resolution" with upscaling to that resolution or "video passthrough" untouched.
Why can't a media player do something similar?

Obviously subtitles and other overlays need to be parsed first, so it would not be really RAW, see some problems there, but you could be right there are more? Changing aspect ratios is something which i dislike too. Keep you fingers off and reproduce it as it is on the source. Black bars are no problem for me, cutting off parts and deformations are unacceptable. Not everybody's view of course.

Regarding the upscaling job. I have a large collection of DVD's. Tried many media players next to high end Philips and high end Pioneer BD-Players. None of the media players I tried come even close to the DVD picture quality upscaled on my 37/42/55 inch HDTV 's using those BD-players. For native BD 1:1 copies the difference is much smaller but still visible also on smaller TV's. BD-players are my reference regarding picture quality. Keep in mind the topic here is DVD and BD ISO's preferable based on 1:1 copies.
Himedia media players are not part of it yet, but I will find out soon as I ordered a Q10 Pro.  I hope it will do a similar job. Will share the results here of course.
Don't say high-end BD-Players are far more expensive than media players, I am aware of that.